MED0001654827 – This website contains imagery which is only suitable for audiences 18+. All surgery contains risks, Read more here

mobilewrap-bg-img
Follow us
pagebannerbg-d-img

Choosing a Deep Plane Facelift Surgeon: Why Technique Matters

Dr Scott J Turner | Specialist Plastic Surgeon (FRACS) | Sydney

Here is something most patients don’t realise until they’re two consultations deep: “deep plane facelift” doesn’t always mean the same operation. Two surgeons can both use the phrase while performing different entry points, different amounts of skin undermining, different ligament release and different extents of dissection beneath the SMAS. Same label. Different surgery. If you’re researching a deep plane facelift, that variation matters more than almost anything else you’ll read.

It matters because it changes how you should compare surgeons. The useful questions aren’t answered by the procedure name. They’re answered by what’s actually done: where the deep plane is entered, how much skin is lifted off the deeper layers, which retaining ligaments are released, and whether the dissection extends into the midface, jawline and upper neck.

I’m going to walk through those differences in plain language, give you the questions I’d want answered if I were the patient, and tell you where I stand. Dr Scott J Turner is a Specialist Plastic Surgeon (FRACS) consulting in Bondi Junction and Manly, Sydney.

Quick Answer: What Should You Ask When Choosing a Deep Plane Facelift Surgeon?

Ask what the surgeon means by “deep plane”, where the deep plane is entered, how much skin undermining is performed, which retaining ligaments are released, whether the dissection is limited or extended, how the neck is addressed, and how the facial nerve branches are protected. These details matter because two surgeons may both use the term “deep plane facelift” while performing operations of different extent.

Why Surgeon Selection Matters in Deep Plane Facelift

Deep plane facelift is technique-sensitive surgery. The surgeon works beneath the SMAS layer, around retaining ligaments and close to facial nerve branches, so the operation depends less on its name and more on the surgeon’s training, anatomical knowledge, entry point, release pattern, fixation strategy and judgement about how far the dissection should go.

Each item on that list is a decision made in theatre, and surgeons make them differently. Comparing surgeons only by the phrase “deep plane facelift” means comparing labels, not operations.

The Minimum Concept: Working Beneath the SMAS

At its most basic, deep plane facelift means dissection beneath the SMAS, the Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System, the deeper support layer under the skin and superficial fat. A deep plane approach works below this layer rather than only tightening or folding it, which is the territory of the SMAS facelift.

But here’s the caveat that motivates this whole article: entering beneath the SMAS for a short distance doesn’t tell the whole story. Not even close. The extent of release and mobilisation is where the operations diverge.

Comparing Apples With Apples: Not Every Deep Plane Facelift Is the Same

Patients often assume that if two surgeons offer a deep plane facelift, they’re offering the same thing. Not always. One may perform a limited release just beneath the SMAS. Another may perform an extended release across the midface, nasolabial region, jawline and upper neck.

The differences worth asking about:

  • Where does the surgeon enter the deep plane?
  • How much skin undermining is performed?
  • Is the skin-SMAS relationship preserved where possible?
  • Which retaining ligaments are released, and is the release limited to a small area?
  • Does the dissection extend into the midface or toward the nasolabial region?
  • Is the upper neck included?
  • How is the composite flap fixed, and how are facial nerve branches protected?

These differences affect what the operation is designed to address. The label alone won’t tell you whether you’re comparing the same procedure.

Why the Term “Deep Plane” Can Be Confusing

“Deep plane” is two things at once: an anatomical plane and a marketing phrase. The anatomy hasn’t changed. The marketing has. The term now appears across social media and clinic websites attached to operations of very different extent, and Nahai (Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 2024) has argued that some currently popular “deep plane” techniques bear only modest resemblance to Hamra’s original description of the operation.

I’m not telling you that to make you cynical. The practical lesson is simple: don’t rely on the label. Ask the surgeon what they mean by deep plane facelift, and listen for an answer about tissue, not branding.

Deep Plane Entry Point

First difference: where you go in. The point where the surgeon enters the deep plane is one of the first technical differences between surgeons, and anatomical work on entry points has focused on their relationship to the facial nerve branches, including the buccal branch, because safe entry and dissection are central to the operation (Best et al., Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 2024).

Traditional Entry Line

Some surgeons enter along a classic line, a well-established pattern that defines where the sub-SMAS work begins and how much skin is elevated before the deeper plane is reached.

Lateral Entry Point

A more lateral entry can allow the surgeon to preserve more of the skin-SMAS attachment before entering the deeper plane, which supports preservation-style surgery by limiting how much skin is separated from the layers beneath it. The choice between entry points depends on anatomy, soft-tissue thickness, revision status and the surgeon’s technique, and it always has to account for the nerve branches nearby.

What this means for you: the entry point influences how much skin is separated from the deeper layers before the sub-SMAS work begins, and it shapes how the surgeon plans the release and the lift vector for the midface, jawline and neck.

Limited Skin Undermining and Preservation-Style Deep Plane

Preservation-style deep plane surgery aims to avoid unnecessary separation between the skin and the deeper facial layers. Instead of wide skin undermining, the surgeon preserves more of the skin-SMAS relationship and releases the deeper structures where movement is actually needed. Less delamination. More composite movement. Not a skin pull.

This isn’t my invention, and it isn’t fringe. A 2025 description of the preservation facelift describes a tissue-sparing approach combining extended deep plane and high SMAS elements while minimising skin delamination and preserving deeper anatomical structures where possible (Lellouch et al., Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 2025).

How Far Does the Deep Plane Dissection Go?

This is the question the label hides completely. Some operations involve a limited sub-SMAS dissection, a centimetre or two past the entry point, or selected release in areas such as the premasseteric space. Others extend much further: into the midface, the nasolabial region, along the jawline and into the upper neck, sometimes alongside dedicated neck lift surgery. That’s not a small range.

Both can be described as deep plane. They are not the same surgical plan. So the question to ask isn’t just whether the technique is deep plane. It’s what gets released, how far the dissection extends, and which areas of your face are actually being addressed. Of all the apples-with-apples questions in this article, this is the one I’d put first.

Limited Deep Plane vs Extended Deep Plane

Feature Limited Deep Plane Extended Deep Plane
Sub-SMAS dissection More localised Broader mobilisation
Ligament release Selected or limited More extensive retaining ligament release
Midface reach More limited May extend into the midface
Nasolabial region Usually limited May be addressed more directly
Neck connection Variable May extend into the upper neck and platysma flap planning
Technical demand Still requires anatomical knowledge Higher complexity and training requirement

Jacono and Bryant describe an extended deep plane technique involving release of the zygomatic, masseteric, mandibular and cervical retaining ligaments, with repositioning of a composite deep plane flap (Jacono and Bryant, Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 2018). That paper is a useful reference point for what “extended” means when surgeons who focus on this operation use the word.

Ligament Release: The Key Technical Difference

The retaining ligaments tether the facial soft tissues to deeper structures. Think of them as anchor points. Release the right ones and the deeper tissues can move as a composite flap, instead of skin tension carrying the correction.

This is also exactly where definitions vary. Some surgeons release only selected areas. Others release more broadly across the zygomatic, masseteric, mandibular and cervical retaining ligament zones. Same word in the brochure, very different amount of surgery underneath it.

In practical terms, ligament release is one of the main reasons deep plane surgery differs from a skin-only or more limited facelift. The aim isn’t simply to tighten the surface; it’s to mobilise the deeper facial tissues where that movement is appropriate.

From Limited Zygomatic Release to Wider Facial Release

Deep plane techniques have evolved. Earlier, more limited approaches often focused on one zone, typically the zygomatic region. Modern extended approaches may release across the midface, jawline and upper neck, mobilising a larger composite flap. The trade is plain: the broader the release, the more the operation can address, and the more it demands of the surgeon’s precision.

When Is It an Extended Deep Plane Facelift?

A facelift is usually described as extended deep plane when the dissection goes beyond a limited sub-SMAS entry and extends into areas such as the midface, nasolabial region, jawline and upper neck, with broader retaining ligament release. The exact definition still varies between surgeons. Wever (Facial Plastic Surgery, 2024) describes extended deep plane techniques as complex partly because they assume release of the medial zygomatic retaining ligaments, which makes the operation heavily dependent on training and experience.

Dr Turner’s Approach: Preservation Plus Extended Deep Plane

In my clinical opinion, the most meaningful modern deep plane surgery for many suitable patients combines preservation principles with extended deep plane release. Limit the skin undermining that doesn’t need to happen. Perform enough deep release to mobilise the tissues that actually need to move. Those two ideas aren’t in tension; done properly, they’re the same philosophy applied to different layers.

That is my clinical view, not a universal rule you’ll find proven in the literature, and I tell patients that directly. The appropriate operation still depends on anatomy, tissue position, skin quality, neck involvement, prior surgery, medical history and what consultation actually finds. Some patients need a different plan altogether: a more limited release, a combined neck procedure, eyelid or brow surgery, fat grafting, or no surgery at all. For you as a patient comparing surgeons, the takeaway is a question: is the proposed operation a limited deep plane release, a preservation-style approach, an extended release, or a combination of preservation and extension? A surgeon should be able to answer that for their own technique without hesitation. If they can’t, keep asking. The deep plane facelift surgery in Sydney page explains how I plan the operation in my practice.

Why Training and Education Matter

The deep plane sits close to the facial nerve branches, extended dissection requires detailed knowledge of the danger zones, and ligament release is technically demanding, and it requires specific training and sustained experience in this plane. Williams and Urban describe the transition to extended deep plane facelifting as involving consultation with experienced colleagues and frequent cadaver dissections during the adoption period (Williams and Urban, Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics, 2024), and Wever makes the same point from the ligament-release side: these techniques are highly dependent on training and experience.

The operation is not defined by its label. It’s defined by the surgeon’s execution. Which is why, for patients seeking advanced deep plane techniques, surgeon selection carries more weight here than almost anywhere else in facelift surgery.

Questions to Ask About Deep Plane Technique

Bring these to consultation:

  1. What do you mean by deep plane facelift?
  2. Where do you enter the deep plane?
  3. How much skin undermining is planned?
  4. Which retaining ligaments are released, and is the release limited or extended?
  5. Does the dissection reach the midface or nasolabial region?
  6. How is the neck addressed?
  7. How do you protect the facial nerve branches?
  8. Is this preservation-style, extended deep plane, or another variation?
  9. Why is this technique appropriate for my anatomy?
  10. How did you train in this technique?

A surgeon who regularly performs this surgery should be able to explain their technique clearly, including why it suits your anatomy, and those answers will tell you far more than the procedure name on the website did.

How This Differs From SMAS Facelift

A SMAS facelift works on the SMAS layer itself. A deep plane facelift works beneath it. The difference becomes most meaningful when the deep plane dissection is extended and selected retaining ligaments are released, because that’s when the operation is doing something a SMAS facelift structurally doesn’t. For the full side-by-side, including my view on where each technique fits, read the Deep Plane vs SMAS Facelift comparison.

Risks and Limitations

Deep plane facelift surgery is still major facial surgery, whichever variation is performed. As with any facelift technique, risks may include bleeding or haematoma, infection, delayed wound healing, visible scarring, skin or tissue compromise, asymmetry, altered sensation, facial nerve weakness or injury, contour irregularity, hairline changes, anaesthetic risks, dissatisfaction with the result and the possible need for revision surgery. Suitability depends on individual anatomy, medical history, smoking status, previous procedures, skin quality and the extent of facial and neck change, which is why everything in this article ends at the same place: assessment.

Deep Plane Facelift Technique FAQs

What makes a facelift a deep plane facelift?

A deep plane facelift generally involves working beneath the SMAS layer. However, surgeons vary in entry point, extent of sub-SMAS dissection, ligament release and whether the dissection is limited or extended. The label alone does not describe the full operation, which is why patients are encouraged to ask what the surgeon means by the term.

Is every deep plane facelift the same?

No. Two surgeons may both use the term while performing different operations. One may perform a limited release just beneath the SMAS, while another performs an extended release across the midface, nasolabial region, jawline and upper neck with broader retaining ligament release. Comparing surgeons requires comparing technique details, not procedure names.

What is a preservation deep plane facelift?

Preservation-style deep plane surgery aims to limit unnecessary separation between the skin and the deeper facial layers. Rather than wide skin undermining, the surgeon preserves more of the skin-SMAS relationship and releases deeper structures where movement is needed, so the tissues move as a composite unit rather than as a stretched surface.

What is an extended deep plane facelift?

A facelift is usually described as extended deep plane when the dissection extends beyond a limited sub-SMAS entry into areas such as the midface, nasolabial region, jawline and upper neck, with broader release of the retaining ligaments. Definitions still vary between surgeons, and the technique is regarded as complex and dependent on training and experience.

How does Dr Turner approach deep plane facelift surgery?

Dr Turner plans deep plane facelift surgery according to the patient’s anatomy, tissue position, skin quality, neck involvement, previous surgery and medical history. For many suitable patients, his approach combines preservation principles with extended deep plane release, limiting unnecessary skin undermining while mobilising the deeper tissues that require movement. The appropriate technique is determined during consultation.

Discuss Deep Plane Facelift Surgery in Sydney

To discuss deep plane facelift surgery in Sydney, book a consultation with Dr Scott J Turner, Specialist Plastic Surgeon (FRACS). Consultations are available in Bondi Junction and Manly.

A GP referral is required before a cosmetic surgery consultation, and AHPRA-required steps apply before any procedure, including a minimum of two consultations and a 7-day cooling-off period.

Call 1300 437 758 or visit the contact page to request an appointment.